Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin expressed his support for the existence of a Hezbollah betting section on the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket. The prediction markets in question include bets on whether Israel will invade Lebanon within certain timeframes, the possibility of a ceasefire, and whether US military forces will take action in the region this year.
The crypto community member known as “Legendary” expressed his concerns in an X post on Monday, arguing that this section “makes war look like a football game to bet on.” In response, Buterin defended the purpose of these markets and their ability to provide more accurate predictions.
I support these existing. The point of polymarket is that from the perspective of traders it’s a betting site, but from the perspective of viewers it’s a news site. There’s all kinds of people (incl elites) on twitter and the internet making harmful and inaccurate predictions…
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) October 1, 2024
Buterin’s perspective on prediction markets
Earlier Tuesday, Buterin explained that, from a trader’s perspective, Polymarket can be considered a betting site, but for viewers, it functions more like a news site. He argued that having access to predictions with probabilities based on people who actually have “something at stake” helps mitigate the spread of misinformation about conflicts.
According to Buterin, the existence of these markets is not about “making money from bad things that happen,” but rather about “creating an environment where speech has consequences,” punishing both unjustified alarmism and baseless complacency, without relying on censors. government or corporate.
The fine line in prediction markets
The debate about the ethical implications of these markets did not go unnoticed. In a conversation with Chainlink member Zach Rynes, Buterin was questioned about the risk that prediction markets could influence real-life events, such as murder prediction markets.
Buterin made it clear that he would oppose any market that acted as a primary incentive to commit bad actions in order to take advantage of inside information.
Rynes acknowledged that his example was extreme, but insisted that any market related to influenceable events could incentivize actions in the real world, even if that was not the intention. Buterin accepted the possibility of this risk, but suggested that platforms like Polymarket are far from reaching that level of influence, and proposed introducing soft limits based on size to avoid such situations.
Polymarket and the expansion of the project
Buterin’s participation in Polymarket is not coincidental. In May, the Ethereum co-founder participated in the $45 million Series B funding round, led by Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund and other investors including 1confirmation and ParaFi. Last week, it emerged that Polymarket is considering raising more than $50 million in new capital and launching a token, underscoring the platform’s expansion.
In summary
Vitalik Buterin’s statements open a crucial debate about prediction markets on platforms like Polymarket. While these markets can offer a more accurate view of complex events, they also pose ethical challenges and potential risks if not handled carefully. The balance between freedom of information and potential real-world consequences remains a topic of discussion.
Do you want to always be updated in the world of cryptocurrencies? Subscribe now to the CriptoTendencia WhatsApp channel! Here you will instantly receive the most relevant information about Bitcoin, Altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, Blockchain and the Metaverse.
Related
Crypto Keynote USA
For the Latest Crypto News, Follow ©KeynoteUSA on Twitter Or Google News.
